# "are you sure it's a good idea to document the software's philosophy in this manner?"

**URL:** <https://enough.discourse.group/t/are-you-sure-its-a-good-idea-to-document-the-softwares-philosophy-in-this-manner/37>\
**Category:** philosophical questions\
**Created:** [May 26, 2026, 10:21pm UTC](https://enough.discourse.group/t/are-you-sure-its-a-good-idea-to-document-the-softwares-philosophy-in-this-manner/37 "2026-05-26T22:21:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![0gs](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex051/user_avatar/enough.discourse.group/0gs/32/8_2.png) [@0gs](https://enough.discourse.group/u/0gs)\
**Post date:** [May 26, 2026, 10:21pm UTC](https://enough.discourse.group/t/are-you-sure-its-a-good-idea-to-document-the-softwares-philosophy-in-this-manner/37/1 "2026-05-26T22:21:44Z")

</div>

i try to suppress most certainties that arise within me, but yes, this feels comfortable, inoffensive, and consistent with enough’s approach.

oh, and if you’re wondering, they were posted in reverse chronological order due to the way Discourse organizes lists of posts by default, and with replies disabled to, uh, maintain canonicality.

all typos or bizarre turns of phrase are my own (i’m graham smith).
